Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hurdle v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment against Kelvin Hurdle in his Title VII employment discrimination claims against the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. The appeals court reviewed the district court case and found no reversible errors in the lower court's reasoning. The appeals court denied Hurdle's request for appointment of counsel and did not hold oral arguments, determining the case details were clear in existing filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-07-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1053

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment against Kelvin Hurdle in his Title VII employment discrimination claims against the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. The appeals court reviewed the district court case and found no reversible errors in the lower court's reasoning. The appeals court denied Hurdle's request for appointment of counsel and did not hold oral arguments, determining the case details were clear in existing filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Hurdle v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment against Kelvin Hurdle in his Title VII employment discrimination claims against the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. The appeals court reviewed the district court case and found no reversible errors in the lower court's reasoning. The appeals court denied Hurdle's request for appointment of counsel and did not hold oral arguments, determining the case details were clear in existing filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1053

    KELVIN J. HURDLE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
    (CA-00-336)

    Submitted:

    June 29, 2001

    Decided:

    July 16, 2001

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Kelvin J. Hurdle, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kelvin J. Hurdle seeks to appeal the district courts order
    granting summary judgment against him on his Title VII claims. See
    42 U.S.C.A. 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000).

    We have

    reviewed the record, the district courts opinion, and the materials submitted by the parties and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Hurdle v. Virginia, No. CA-00-336 (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 2001).

    We deny

    Hurdles motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like