Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hunt v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Charles Bennie Hunt appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment or transfer of his case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found Hunt's appeal to be without merit. According to the reasoning of the district court, the Fourth Circuit denied Hunt's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-10-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7179

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Bennie Hunt appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment or transfer of his case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found Hunt's appeal to be without merit. According to the reasoning of the district court, the Fourth Circuit denied Hunt's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Hunt v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Bennie Hunt appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment or transfer of his case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found Hunt's appeal to be without merit. According to the reasoning of the district court, the Fourth Circuit denied Hunt's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7179

    CHARLES BENNIE HUNT,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MICHAEL EASLEY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-98-9-H-5)

    Submitted:

    October 8, 1998

    Decided:

    October 28, 1998

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Bennie Hunt, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Bennie Hunt appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion for relief from judgment or in the alternative, motion
    for transfer of action. Our review of the record and the district
    courts opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Hunts motion to proceed on appeal in forma
    pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. Hunt v. North Carolina, No. CA-98-9-H-5 (E.D.N.C. July 7,
    1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like