Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anthony Harris v. T.A. Knuckles, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Anthony Ray Harris's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court of Appeals also denied Harris's pending motions and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-11-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7151

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Anthony Ray Harris's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court of Appeals also denied Harris's pending motions and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Anthony Harris v. T.A. Knuckles, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Anthony Ray Harris's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court of Appeals also denied Harris's pending motions and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7151

    ANTHONY RAY HARRIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    T.A. KNUCKLES; K.M. MCCAULEY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever III,
    Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03206-D)

    Submitted:

    November 15, 2011

    Decided:

    November 18, 2011

    Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Ray Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony Ray Harris appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Harris v. Knuckles, No. 5:10-ct-03206-D (E.D.N.C. July

    22, 2011).
    oral

    We deny Harris pending motions and dispense with

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like