Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Matherly v. Johns, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Thomas Shane Matherly's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2011 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's denial of Matherly's § 2241 petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-05-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6237

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Thomas Shane Matherly's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2011 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's denial of Matherly's § 2241 petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Matherly v. Johns, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Thomas Shane Matherly's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2011 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's denial of Matherly's § 2241 petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6237

    THOMAS SHANE MATHERLY,


    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    TRACY W. JOHNS,
    Respondent Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:10-hc-02091-BO)

    Submitted:

    April 28, 2011

    Decided:

    May 4, 2011

    Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Thomas Shane Matherly, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Bryan Royster,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas

    Matherly

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.


    2010)

    petition.

    We

    reversible error.

    Jan.

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    (E.D.N.C.

    have

    28,

    Matherly v. Johns, No. 5:10-hc-02091-BO

    2011).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like