Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hoey, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Tony Hoey appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hoey's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8613

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tony Hoey appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hoey's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Hoey, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tony Hoey appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hoey's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8613

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    TONY HOEY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Shelby.
    Lacy H. Thornburg,
    District Judge. (4:96-cr-00053-LHT-13)

    Submitted:

    May 28, 2009

    Decided:

    June 5, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tony Hoey, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Tony
    denying
    3582(c)

    his

    Hoey
    motion

    (2006).

    reversible error.

    appeals
    for
    We

    from

    the

    reduction

    have

    district

    of

    reviewed

    courts

    sentence,

    the

    record

    18
    and

    order
    U.S.C.

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Hoey, No. 4:96-cr-

    00053-LHT-13 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like