Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ketelsen, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Thomas Ketelsen's motion to amend his 2004 criminal judgment sentencing him to 210 months in prison. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7506

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Thomas Ketelsen's motion to amend his 2004 criminal judgment sentencing him to 210 months in prison. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Ketelsen, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Thomas Ketelsen's motion to amend his 2004 criminal judgment sentencing him to 210 months in prison. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7506

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    THOMAS LESTER KETELSEN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
    Lacy H. Thornburg,
    District Judge. (1:04-cr-00070-LHT-1)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2009

    Decided:

    May 26, 2009

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Thomas Lester Ketelsen, Appellant Pro Se.


    Gretchen C. F.
    Shappert, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas
    order

    denying

    Lester

    Ketelsen

    Ketelsens

    motion

    appeals
    to

    the

    amend

    the

    sentencing him to 210 months imprisonment.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    district
    2004

    courts
    judgment

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Ketelsen, No. 1:04-cr-00070-LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. July 21, 2008).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like