Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Watson, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    Curtis Lee Watson appealed a district court's denial of his motion for injunctive and declaratory relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Watson's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-04-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8237

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Curtis Lee Watson appealed a district court's denial of his motion for injunctive and declaratory relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Watson's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    United States v. Watson, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Curtis Lee Watson appealed a district court's denial of his motion for injunctive and declaratory relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Watson's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8237

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CURTIS LEE WATSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:88-cr-00201-LMB-1)

    Submitted:

    April 22, 2010

    Decided:

    April 27, 2010

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Curtis Lee Watson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Curtis Lee Watson appeals the district courts order
    denying Watson's motion for injunctive and declaratory relief.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Watson, No. 1:88-cr-00201-LMB-1 (E.D.

    Va. filed Nov. 30, 2009; entered Dec. 1, 2009).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like