Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Thomas, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. It affirms the district court's denial of Marcellus Thomas's renewed motion for free transcripts. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirms the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-06-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6431

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. It affirms the district court's denial of Marcellus Thomas's renewed motion for free transcripts. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirms the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Thomas, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. It affirms the district court's denial of Marcellus Thomas's renewed motion for free transcripts. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirms the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6431

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MARCELLUS THOMAS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Lacy H. Thornburg,
    District Judge. (CR-00-233)

    Submitted:

    June 21, 2005

    Decided:

    June 30, 2005

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Marcellus Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, OFFICE


    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Marcellus

    Thomas

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his renewed motion for transcripts at government expense.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See United States v. Thomas, No. CR-00-233 (W.D.N.C. filed

    Mar. 3 & entered Mar. 4, 2005).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like