Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Arnold, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Curtis Arnold's motion to amend his presentence report. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The appeals court decided the case without oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6944

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Curtis Arnold's motion to amend his presentence report. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The appeals court decided the case without oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Arnold, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Curtis Arnold's motion to amend his presentence report. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The appeals court decided the case without oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6944

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CURTIS ARNOLD,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Robert J. Conrad,
    Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00046-RJC-DSC-2)

    Submitted:

    October 20, 2009

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge,


    HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Decided:

    NIEMEYER,

    October 26, 2009

    Circuit

    Judge,

    and

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Curtis Arnold, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. OMalley, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Curtis

    Arnold

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his motion to amend his presentence report.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2009).

    Arnold,

    No.

    3:05-cr-00046-RJC-DSC-2

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like