Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Narvaez v. United States, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Luis M. Narvaez's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-12-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7516

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Luis M. Narvaez's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Narvaez v. United States, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Luis M. Narvaez's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7516

    LUIS M. NARVAEZ,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
    Judge. (7:06-cv-00469-jct)

    Submitted: December 14, 2006

    Decided:

    December 21, 2006

    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Luis M. Narvaez, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Luis M. Narvaez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000) petition.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Narvaez v. United States, No. 7:06-cv-00469 (W.D. Va.

    Aug. 10, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like