Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Bryant, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Belinda Renee Bryant appealed the district court's denial of her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling denying Bryant's § 2255 motion for the reasons stated in its September 23, 2008 decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8302

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Belinda Renee Bryant appealed the district court's denial of her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling denying Bryant's § 2255 motion for the reasons stated in its September 23, 2008 decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Bryant, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Belinda Renee Bryant appealed the district court's denial of her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling denying Bryant's § 2255 motion for the reasons stated in its September 23, 2008 decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8302

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    BELINDA RENEE BRYANT, a/k/a Renee,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (5:95-cr-00149-H-1; 5:05-cv-00075-H)

    Submitted:

    March 17, 2009

    Decided:

    March 23, 2009

    Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Belinda Renee Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Belinda

    Renee

    Bryant

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2008)


    motion.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly,

    district

    we

    court.

    affirm

    for

    United

    States

    5:95-cr-00149-H-1;

    5:05-cv-00075-H

    We

    oral

    dispense

    with

    the

    argument

    reasons

    stated

    v.

    Bryant,

    (E.D.N.C.
    because

    the

    Sept.
    facts

    by

    23,
    and

    the
    Nos.

    2008).
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like