Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Calvin L. Fetter v. Mohamed S. Moubarek, Doctor Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 56 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    Calvin Fetter appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the court dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-05-30 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 56 F.3d 61 Docket: 95-6305

    Original Title

    Calvin L. Fetter v. Mohamed S. Moubarek, Doctor Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 56 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Calvin Fetter appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the court dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    Calvin L. Fetter v. Mohamed S. Moubarek, Doctor Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 56 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Calvin Fetter appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the court dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    56 F.

    3d 61
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Calvin L. FETTER, Petitioner--Appellant,


    v.
    Mohamed S. MOUBAREK, Doctor; Attorney General of The
    State
    of Maryland, Respondents--Appellees.
    No. 95-6305.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: April 20, 1995
    Decided: May 30, 1995

    Calvin L. Fetter, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Fetter v. Moubarek, No. CA-95-312-WMN (D. Md. Feb. 8,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like