Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McBride v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Robert McBride appealed a district court decision that dismissed his challenge to the constitutionality of a Virginia statute and denied his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining they would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-2231

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert McBride appealed a district court decision that dismissed his challenge to the constitutionality of a Virginia statute and denied his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining they would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    McBride v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert McBride appealed a district court decision that dismissed his challenge to the constitutionality of a Virginia statute and denied his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining they would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-2231

    ROBERT MCBRIDE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (2:08-cv-00367-RBS-JEB)

    Submitted:

    April 22, 2009

    Decided:

    May 6, 2009

    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert McBride, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert

    McBride

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders

    dismissing this action challenging the constitutionality of a


    Virginia statute and denying his motion for reconsideration.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    McBride v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 2:08-cv-00367-

    court.

    RBS-JEB (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 9, 2008, entered Sept. 11, 2008;
    filed Sept. 23, 2008, entered Sept. 25, 2008).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like