Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sandra Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Sandra Robinson's motion to file a belated appeal of the district court's ruling in her case against Nielsen TV Ratings. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-03-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-1849

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Sandra Robinson's motion to file a belated appeal of the district court's ruling in her case against Nielsen TV Ratings. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    Sandra Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Sandra Robinson's motion to file a belated appeal of the district court's ruling in her case against Nielsen TV Ratings. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-1849

    SANDRA ROBINSON,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    NIELSEN TV RATINGS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (3:10-cv-00009-JRS)

    Submitted:

    January 28, 2013

    Decided:

    March 19, 2013

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sandra Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. John M. Barr, Crystal L.


    Norrick, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Sandra

    Robinson

    appeals

    the

    district

    denying her motion to file a belated appeal.


    the record and find no reversible error.
    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    district

    court.

    Robinson

    v.

    Nielsen TV Ratings, No. 3:10-cv-00009-JRS (E.D. Va. June 19,


    2012).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like