Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hull v. Baltimore City Comm College, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) Adonica Q. Hull appealed a district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination case as untimely filed. 2) The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-11-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1874

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Adonica Q. Hull appealed a district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination case as untimely filed. 2) The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Hull v. Baltimore City Comm College, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Adonica Q. Hull appealed a district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination case as untimely filed. 2) The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1874

    ADONICA Q. HULL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE; AFSCME 92,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
    (1:06-cv-01439-WDQ)

    Submitted: November 21, 2006

    Decided:

    November 28, 2006

    Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Adonica Q. Hull, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Adonica

    Q.

    Hull

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing as untimely filed her employment discrimination action.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Hull v. Baltimore City Cmty. Coll., No. 1:06-cv-01439-WDQ

    (D. Md. July 5, 2006).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like