Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Steadman v. Crystal Gateway, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    James Steadman filed an employment discrimination complaint against Crystal Gateway Marriott which was dismissed by the district court through summary judgment. Steadman appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials, the Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments and affirmed the dismissal of Steadman's complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1348

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Steadman filed an employment discrimination complaint against Crystal Gateway Marriott which was dismissed by the district court through summary judgment. Steadman appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials, the Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments and affirmed the dismissal of Steadman's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Steadman v. Crystal Gateway, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Steadman filed an employment discrimination complaint against Crystal Gateway Marriott which was dismissed by the district court through summary judgment. Steadman appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials, the Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments and affirmed the dismissal of Steadman's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1348

    JAMES STEADMAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CRYSTAL GATEWAY MARRIOTT,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CA-01-1083-A)

    Submitted:

    September 5, 2002

    Decided:

    September 10, 2002

    Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Steadman, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Bredehoft, VENABLE,
    BAETJER & HOWARD, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Steadman appeals the district court order granting
    summary judgment to Crystal Gateway Marriott and dismissing his
    employment discrimination complaint.

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district courts memorandum opinion and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. See Steadman v. Crystal Gateway, No. CA-01-1083-A (E.D. Va.


    filed Mar. 11, 2002; entered Mar. 12, 2002).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like