Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Steadman v. Crystal Gateway, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    James Steadman appealed a district court's order granting Crystal Gateway Marriott's motion to dismiss Steadman's complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint for the reasons stated. The appeals court denied Steadman's motion for rehearing and permission to file additional briefs or have oral argument, determining the case did not require further arguments to aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-05-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-2447

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Steadman appealed a district court's order granting Crystal Gateway Marriott's motion to dismiss Steadman's complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint for the reasons stated. The appeals court denied Steadman's motion for rehearing and permission to file additional briefs or have oral argument, determining the case did not require further arguments to aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Steadman v. Crystal Gateway, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Steadman appealed a district court's order granting Crystal Gateway Marriott's motion to dismiss Steadman's complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint for the reasons stated. The appeals court denied Steadman's motion for rehearing and permission to file additional briefs or have oral argument, determining the case did not require further arguments to aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-2447

    JAMES STEADMAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CRYSTAL GATEWAY MARRIOTT,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
    Judge. (CA-02-1230-A)

    Submitted:

    May 15, 2003

    Decided:

    May 20, 2003

    Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Steadman, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Bredehoft, VENABLE,


    BAETJER & HOWARD, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Steadman appeals the district courts order granting
    Crystal

    Gateway

    Marriotts

    Steadmans complaint.

    motion

    to

    dismiss

    and

    dismissing

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    See Steadman v. Crystal Gateway Marriott, No.

    CA-02-1230-A (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 15, 2002; entered Nov. 20, 2002).
    We deny Steadmans motion titled motion for rehearing requesting
    permission to file additional briefs and for oral argument.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like