Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Blakely, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Lori Blakely appealed the district court's denial of her motion to compel the government to file a motion under Rule 35(b) to reduce her sentence and the denial of her motion to reconsider. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and concluded the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6978

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lori Blakely appealed the district court's denial of her motion to compel the government to file a motion under Rule 35(b) to reduce her sentence and the denial of her motion to reconsider. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and concluded the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Blakely, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lori Blakely appealed the district court's denial of her motion to compel the government to file a motion under Rule 35(b) to reduce her sentence and the denial of her motion to reconsider. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and concluded the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6978

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LORI D. BLAKELY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (CR-97-678)

    Submitted:

    July 29, 2004

    Decided:

    August 5, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lori D. Blakely, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Rhett DeHart, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lori D. Blakely appeals the district courts orders
    denying her motion to compel the Government to file a motion under
    Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) and motion to reconsider.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Blakely, Nos. CR-97-678 (D.S.C. May 25, 2004; Feb. 12, 2004).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like