Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Muldrow v. Reich, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Edward Muldrow filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Susanne Reich, a financial accountant for the South Carolina Department of Corrections. The district court denied relief and Muldrow appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-10-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6869

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Edward Muldrow filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Susanne Reich, a financial accountant for the South Carolina Department of Corrections. The district court denied relief and Muldrow appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Muldrow v. Reich, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Edward Muldrow filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Susanne Reich, a financial accountant for the South Carolina Department of Corrections. The district court denied relief and Muldrow appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6869

    EDWARD LEON MULDROW,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SUSANNE REICH, Financial Accountant for South
    Carolina Department of Corrections,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (CA-04-547-3-RBH)

    Submitted:

    October 20, 2005

    Decided:

    October 27, 2005

    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edward Leon Muldrow, Appellant Pro Se.


    Andrew Foster McLeod,
    HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward Leon Muldrow appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Muldrow v.

    Reich, No. CA-04-547-3-RBH (D.S.C. May 26, 2005). We dispense with


    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like