Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • H&W Fresh Seafoods v. Schulman, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to decline reconsidering its denial of Lewis Schulman's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him in a case brought by H&W Fresh Seafoods, Inc. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-02-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-2425

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to decline reconsidering its denial of Lewis Schulman's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him in a case brought by H&W Fresh Seafoods, Inc. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    H&W Fresh Seafoods v. Schulman, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to decline reconsidering its denial of Lewis Schulman's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him in a case brought by H&W Fresh Seafoods, Inc. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-2425

    H&W FRESH SEAFOODS, INCORPORATED,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LEWIS SCHULMAN,
    Defendant - Appellant,
    and
    SCOTT TAYLOR; HEWS SEAFOOD, INCORPORATED,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA98-3851-CCB)

    Submitted:

    February 14, 2002

    Decided:

    February 22, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Lewis Schulman, Appellant Pro Se. John Stephen Simms, GREBER &
    SIMMS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lewis Schulman appeals from the district courts order declining to reconsider the denial of Schulmans motion to vacate the
    default judgment entered against him.

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. H&W
    Fresh Seafoods, Inc. v. Schulman, No. CA-98-3851-CCB (D. Md. July
    12, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like