Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Duquesne v. Jones, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eugenio Duquesne of the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, dispensing with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7387

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eugenio Duquesne of the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, dispensing with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Duquesne v. Jones, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eugenio Duquesne of the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, dispensing with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7387

    EUGENIO DUQUESNE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    W. K. JONES; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, on
    relation of James E. Long, Commissioner of
    Insurance of North Carolina,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District
    Judge. (CA-95-584-5-BR)
    Submitted:

    January 18, 1996

    Decided:

    February 1, 1996

    Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Eugenio Duquesne, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    Duquesne v. Jones, No. CA-95-584-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like