Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nash v. Duncan, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Kelvin Nash's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as time-barred. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Nash's complaint for being untimely filed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7012

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Kelvin Nash's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as time-barred. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Nash's complaint for being untimely filed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Nash v. Duncan, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Kelvin Nash's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as time-barred. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Nash's complaint for being untimely filed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7012

    KELVIN NASH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOUGLAS DUNCAN; WAYNE CUMMINGS; TERESA DURHAM;
    MATTHEW MARKON; JUAN PRICE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-05-25-WDQ)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2005

    Decided:

    October 21, 2005

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kelvin Nash, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Wellington Thompson, Jr.,


    County Attorney, Sharon Veronica Burrell, Joann Robertson, COUNTY
    ATTORNEYS OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kelvin Nash appeals the district courts order denying as
    time-barred his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    No. CA-05-25-WDQ (D. Md. June 8, 2005).

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    See Nash v. Duncan,

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like