Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stalvey v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    George Stalvey appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider the denial of his previous §2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the district court's reasoning for denying the motion to reconsider. The Fourth Circuit also cited Lindh v. Murphy in its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6391

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Stalvey appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider the denial of his previous §2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the district court's reasoning for denying the motion to reconsider. The Fourth Circuit also cited Lindh v. Murphy in its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Stalvey v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Stalvey appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider the denial of his previous §2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the district court's reasoning for denying the motion to reconsider. The Fourth Circuit also cited Lindh v. Murphy in its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6391

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GEORGE RONALD STALVEY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District
    Judge. (CR-90-190-MU, CA-95-174-3-MU)
    Submitted:

    September 11, 1997

    Decided:

    September 19, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    George Ronald Stalvey, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
    motion to reconsider the denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.
    2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Stalvey v. United States, Nos. CR90-190-MU; CA-95-174-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 1997). See Lindh v.
    Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 966298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like