Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Barber v. Harris, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Carlton Ray Barber Jr.'s appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The appellate court denied Barber's motion for appointment of counsel and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6711

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Carlton Ray Barber Jr.'s appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The appellate court denied Barber's motion for appointment of counsel and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Barber v. Harris, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Carlton Ray Barber Jr.'s appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The appellate court denied Barber's motion for appointment of counsel and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6711

    CARLTON RAY BARBER, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    TODD HARRIS, Detective, Robeson County Sheriffs Dept.;
    ROBESON COUNTY CLERK OF COURT; ROBERT D. JACOBSON, Attorney,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03153-FL)

    Submitted:

    November 19, 2009

    Decided:

    December 2, 2009

    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carlton Ray Barber, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Carlton

    Barber,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) action.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    courts
    We have

    Accordingly,

    we deny Barbers motion for appointment of counsel and affirm


    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Barber v. Harris,

    No. 5:08-ct-03153-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2009).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like