Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Crawford v. Dawkins, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Perry L. Crawford appealed the magistrate judge's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Samuel Dawkins. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the magistrate judge's decision for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The court issued a final ruling of "AFFIRMED".

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6359

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Perry L. Crawford appealed the magistrate judge's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Samuel Dawkins. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the magistrate judge's decision for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The court issued a final ruling of "AFFIRMED".

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Crawford v. Dawkins, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Perry L. Crawford appealed the magistrate judge's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Samuel Dawkins. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the magistrate judge's decision for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The court issued a final ruling of "AFFIRMED".

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-6359

    PERRY L. CRAWFORD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SAMUEL DAWKINS, Medical Doctor,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham.
    Russell A. Eliason,
    Magistrate Judge. (1:05-cv-913)
    Submitted:

    July 9, 2007

    Decided:

    July 31, 2007

    Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Perry L. Crawford, Appellant Pro Se.
    Elizabeth P. McCullough,
    YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Perry L. Crawford appeals the magistrate judges order*
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Crawford v.


    Dawkins, No. l:05-cv-913 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2007).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate


    judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) (2000).
    - 2 -

    You might also like