Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Alston, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Thomas Alston appealed the denial of his motion for return of property seized by the United States. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, as Alston did not contest the United States' assertion that it did not possess the disputed property. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-04-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6065

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Thomas Alston appealed the denial of his motion for return of property seized by the United States. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, as Alston did not contest the United States' assertion that it did not possess the disputed property. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Alston, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Thomas Alston appealed the denial of his motion for return of property seized by the United States. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, as Alston did not contest the United States' assertion that it did not possess the disputed property. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6065

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    THOMAS LEROY ALSTON,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
    District Judge. (2:08-cr-00828-PMD-1)

    Submitted:

    March 30, 2010

    Decided:

    April 6, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Thomas Leroy Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant


    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Charleston,
    South
    Carolina,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas Leroy Alston appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for return of property, pursuant to Fed. R.
    Crim. P. 41(g).
    United

    States

    Alston does not contest the assertion of the

    that

    none

    of

    the

    disputed

    property

    is

    in

    its

    possession.

    Accordingly, we affirm the district courts order.

    We

    with

    dispense

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like