Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Sutton, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    Quinton Leon Sutton appealed a district court order that affirmed a magistrate judge's denial of his motion to compel discovery. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Sutton's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to compel discovery. The appeals court granted Sutton's request to proceed in forma pauperis but ruled that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-01-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7406

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Quinton Leon Sutton appealed a district court order that affirmed a magistrate judge's denial of his motion to compel discovery. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Sutton's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to compel discovery. The appeals court granted Sutton's request to proceed in forma pauperis but ruled that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    United States v. Sutton, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Quinton Leon Sutton appealed a district court order that affirmed a magistrate judge's denial of his motion to compel discovery. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Sutton's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to compel discovery. The appeals court granted Sutton's request to proceed in forma pauperis but ruled that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7406

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Petitioner - Appellee,

    versus

    QUINTON LEON SUTTON,


    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham.
    Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CR-98-355)

    Submitted:

    December 18, 2003

    Decided:

    January 16, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Quinton Leon Sutton, Appellant Pro Se.


    Sandra Jane Hairston,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Quinton Leon Sutton appeals the district courts order
    affirming the magistrate judges order denying Suttons motion for
    reconsideration of the denial of his motion to compel discovery.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,


    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United

    States v. Sutton, No. CR-98-355 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2003).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like