Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    Charles Anthony Brown appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court's orders and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit granted Brown's motion to supplement his brief, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying Brown's § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7303

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Anthony Brown appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court's orders and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit granted Brown's motion to supplement his brief, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying Brown's § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    16 views2 pages

    United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Anthony Brown appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court's orders and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit granted Brown's motion to supplement his brief, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying Brown's § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7303

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CHARLES ANTHONY BROWN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    C. Weston Houck, District Judge.
    (CR-94-297, CA-98-2620-12-4)

    Submitted:

    September 20, 2001

    Decided:

    September 25, 2001

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Anthony Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Anthony Brown appeals the district courts orders and
    judgment denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West
    Supp. 2001), and denying his motion for reconsideration.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts orders and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we grant Browns motion to supple-

    ment his informal brief, deny a certificate of appealability, and


    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    United

    States v. Brown, Nos. CR-94-297; CA-98-2620-12-4 (D.S.C. filed Aug.


    14, 2000, entered Aug. 15, 2000; filed Aug. 24, 2000, entered
    Aug. 25, 2000 & Mar. 20, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like