Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stroupe v. Radio Shack, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Edward E. Stroupe, Jr.'s civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) against Radio Shack, Tandy Corporation, and Transportation Insurance Company. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-06-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1307

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Edward E. Stroupe, Jr.'s civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) against Radio Shack, Tandy Corporation, and Transportation Insurance Company. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Stroupe v. Radio Shack, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Edward E. Stroupe, Jr.'s civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) against Radio Shack, Tandy Corporation, and Transportation Insurance Company. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1307

    EDWARD E. STROUPE, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RADIO SHACK; TANDY CORPORATION; TRANSPORTATION
    INSURANCE COMPANY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
    Glen M. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-05-13-1)

    Submitted:

    June 9, 2005

    Decided:

    June 14, 2005

    Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Scott Bell, PENN,
    STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order

    denying

    relief

    on

    1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).
    reversible error.
    district court.

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    civil

    complaint

    under

    28

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Stroupe v. Radio Shack, No. CA-05-13-1 (W.D.

    Va. Mar. 2, 2005).


    facts

    his

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like