Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ingram-Allen v. Iveys, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Tawana Ingram-Allen appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil complaint against Iveys corporation. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion is not legally binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately represented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Ingram-Allen's complaint against Iveys.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-06-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1280

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tawana Ingram-Allen appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil complaint against Iveys corporation. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion is not legally binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately represented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Ingram-Allen's complaint against Iveys.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Ingram-Allen v. Iveys, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tawana Ingram-Allen appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil complaint against Iveys corporation. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion is not legally binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately represented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Ingram-Allen's complaint against Iveys.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1280

    TAWANA S. INGRAM-ALLEN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    IVEYS, (A Corp.),
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
    Judge. (CA-03-196-1)

    Submitted:

    May 27, 2004

    Decided:

    June 3, 2004

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tawana S. Ingram-Allen, Appellant Pro Se. James Bernard Spears,


    Jr., John Doughty Cole, Sr., HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON &
    GREAVES, L.L.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tawana S. Ingram-Allen appeals the district courts order
    dismissing her civil complaint.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    See Ingram-Allen v. Iveys, No. CA-

    03-196-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 26, 2004 & entered Feb. 27, 2004).
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like