Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dennis Gallipeau v. Linda Ham, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    21 views2 pages
    Dennis Gallipeau appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Linda Ham and James Metts. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Gallipeau's complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6949

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dennis Gallipeau appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Linda Ham and James Metts. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Gallipeau's complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    21 views2 pages

    Dennis Gallipeau v. Linda Ham, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Dennis Gallipeau appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Linda Ham and James Metts. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Gallipeau's complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6949

    DENNIS MICHAEL GALLIPEAU,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    LINDA MICKENS HAM; JAMES R. METTS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Beaufort.
    Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
    (9:13-cv-00505-TMC)

    Submitted:

    November 18, 2014

    Decided:

    November 20, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dennis Michael Gallipeau, Appellant Pro Se.


    Justin Tyler
    Bagwell, William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA,
    Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dennis Michael Gallipeau appeals the district courts
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Gallipeau v. Ham, No. 9:13-cv-00505-TMC (D.S.C. June 10,

    2014).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like