Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hunnicutt v. VA Dept Corrections, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Carnell Hunnicutt's § 1983 complaint for failure to comply with a conditional filing order. The district court had dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Hunnicutt did not pay the partial filing fee as required by the conditional order. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6852

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Carnell Hunnicutt's § 1983 complaint for failure to comply with a conditional filing order. The district court had dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Hunnicutt did not pay the partial filing fee as required by the conditional order. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views2 pages

    Hunnicutt v. VA Dept Corrections, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Carnell Hunnicutt's § 1983 complaint for failure to comply with a conditional filing order. The district court had dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Hunnicutt did not pay the partial filing fee as required by the conditional order. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6852

    CARNELL HUNNICUTT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; R. A.
    YOUNG;
    S. K. YOUNG; A. P. HARVEY; R. B.
    PHILLIPS; CHAPLAIN MITCHELL,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-01-254-7)

    Submitted:

    August 9, 2001

    Decided:

    August 17, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Carnell Hunnicutt, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Carnell Hunnicutt appeals the district courts order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint for failure
    to comply with the conditional filing order.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. Hunnicutt v. Virginia Dept of Corrections, No. CA-01-254-7


    (W.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like