Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Russell Rogers, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's order that granted a defendant's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had reduced the defendant's sentence by one month to the statutory mandatory minimum. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision after reviewing the record. The Court also affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its 2008 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-01-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6404

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's order that granted a defendant's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had reduced the defendant's sentence by one month to the statutory mandatory minimum. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision after reviewing the record. The Court also affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its 2008 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Russell Rogers, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's order that granted a defendant's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had reduced the defendant's sentence by one month to the statutory mandatory minimum. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision after reviewing the record. The Court also affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its 2008 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6404

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    RUSSELL G. ROGERS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:03-cr-00609-CMH-1)

    Submitted:

    January 10, 2012

    Decided:

    January 26, 2012

    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Russell G. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Dana


    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
    Appellee.

    James Boente,
    Virginia, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Russell G. Rogers appeals the district courts order
    granting his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and reducing
    his sentence by one month to the statutory mandatory minimum.
    We previously remanded this matter to the district court for a
    determination as to the timeliness of the appeal.

    The appeal

    having been determined to be timely, we turn to the merits of


    the case.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Rogers, No. 1:03-cr-00609-CMH-

    1 (E.D. Va. June 17, 2008).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like