Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mark Bedford v. Gordon Erby, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Mark Bedford filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Gordon Erby, a clerk. The district court denied relief to Bedford. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-01-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7154

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mark Bedford filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Gordon Erby, a clerk. The district court denied relief to Bedford. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Mark Bedford v. Gordon Erby, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mark Bedford filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Gordon Erby, a clerk. The district court denied relief to Bedford. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7154

    MARK I. BEDFORD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    GORDON F. ERBY, Clerk,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:14-cv-00280-RAJ-TEM)

    Submitted:

    December 28, 2015

    Decided:

    January 12, 2016

    Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mark I. Bedford, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
    COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark

    Ivan

    Bedford

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Bedford v. Erby, No. 2:14-cr-00280-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va.

    June 30, 2015).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like