Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Eugene Winder v. Gary Maynard, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Eugene Winder relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Gary Maynard. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-09-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6372

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Eugene Winder relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Gary Maynard. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Eugene Winder v. Gary Maynard, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Eugene Winder relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Gary Maynard. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6372

    EUGENE EDWARD WINDER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    GARY MAYNARD,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
    Judge. (1:13-cv-00748-JFM)

    Submitted:

    September 25, 2014

    Decided:

    September 29, 2014

    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eugene Winder, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
    Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eugene

    Edward

    Winder

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Winder v. Maynard, No. 1:13-cv-00748-JFM (D. Md.

    filed Feb. 24, 2014; entered Feb. 25, 2014).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like