Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wardrick v. Valley Gun Smith, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Robert Junior Wardrick filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Valley Gun Smith, Melvin Abrams, Valley Gun Shop, and Towson Jeffersonian. The district court dismissed Wardrick's complaint without prejudice. Wardrick appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-11-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7245

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Junior Wardrick filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Valley Gun Smith, Melvin Abrams, Valley Gun Shop, and Towson Jeffersonian. The district court dismissed Wardrick's complaint without prejudice. Wardrick appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Wardrick v. Valley Gun Smith, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Junior Wardrick filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Valley Gun Smith, Melvin Abrams, Valley Gun Shop, and Towson Jeffersonian. The district court dismissed Wardrick's complaint without prejudice. Wardrick appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7245

    ROBERT JUNIOR WARDRICK,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    VALLEY GUN SMITH; MELVIN ABRAMS; VALLEY GUN
    SHOP; TOWSON JERRERSONIAN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv01747-AMD)

    Submitted:

    November 15, 2007

    Decided:

    November 27, 2007

    Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Junior Wardrick, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Junior Wardrick appeals the district courts order
    dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court. Wardrick v. Valley Gun Smith, No. 1:07-ct-01747-AMD (D. Md.
    July 31, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like