Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Swann v. McKenzie, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Mark Swann filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Brent McKenzie, which was denied by the district court. Swann appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief on Swann's complaint for the reasons stated by the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided and arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-04-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7924

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mark Swann filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Brent McKenzie, which was denied by the district court. Swann appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief on Swann's complaint for the reasons stated by the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided and arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Swann v. McKenzie, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mark Swann filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Brent McKenzie, which was denied by the district court. Swann appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief on Swann's complaint for the reasons stated by the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided and arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7924

    MARK DAVID SWANN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BRENT MCKENZIE, Case Management Specialist,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:06-cv-00389-RDB)

    Submitted:

    March 29, 2007

    Decided:

    April 5, 2007

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mark David Swann, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark David Swann appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    McKenzie,

    No.

    1:06-cv-00389-RDB

    (D.

    Md.

    Oct.

    We have

    26,

    Swann v.

    2006).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like