Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Alexander v. Patapsco Park Comm, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Mary Alexander appealed the denial of her Rule 60(b) motion in a case against the Patapsco Park Community and others. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-12-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-1942

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mary Alexander appealed the denial of her Rule 60(b) motion in a case against the Patapsco Park Community and others. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Alexander v. Patapsco Park Comm, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mary Alexander appealed the denial of her Rule 60(b) motion in a case against the Patapsco Park Community and others. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-1942

    MARY M. ALEXANDER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PATAPSCO PARK COMMUNITY; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
    SCHOOL SYSTEM; PHIL MARNER; CHUCK BOWIE,
    Representatives,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA3343-MJG)

    Submitted:

    November 30, 2000

    Decided:

    December 7, 2000

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Mary M. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mary M. Alexander appeals the district courts order denying
    her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.

    We have reviewed the record and

    the district courts order and find no reversible error.

    Accord-

    ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See

    Alexander v. Patapsco Park Cmty., No. CA-3343-MJG (D. Md. June 22,
    2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like