Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Scott Rendelman v. United States, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Scott Rendelman's appeal of a district court order granting in part his motion for return of seized property under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-05-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6137

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Scott Rendelman's appeal of a district court order granting in part his motion for return of seized property under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Scott Rendelman v. United States, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Scott Rendelman's appeal of a district court order granting in part his motion for return of seized property under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6137

    SCOTT LEWIS RENDELMAN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    James K. Bredar, District Judge.
    (1:13-cv-03140-JKB; 8:07-cr-00331-JKB-1)

    Submitted:

    May 22, 2014

    Decided: May 29, 2014

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Scott Lewis Rendelman, Appellant Pro Se. Sujit Raman, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C.


    46(d) (2012).

    PER CURIAM:
    Scott

    Rendelman

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    granting in part his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion for return of


    seized

    property.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm the district courts

    order.

    v.

    Rendelman

    United

    States,

    Nos.

    1:13-cv-03140-JKB;

    8:07-cr-00331-JKB-1 (D. Md. filed Jan. 10 & entered Jan. 13,


    2014).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like