Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hester v. Stowe, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Steven E. Hester on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various law enforcement officers and a social worker. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Hester's claims. As such, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-05-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7695

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Steven E. Hester on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various law enforcement officers and a social worker. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Hester's claims. As such, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Hester v. Stowe, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Steven E. Hester on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various law enforcement officers and a social worker. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Hester's claims. As such, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7695

    STEVEN E. HESTER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STEVEN STOWE (F.B.I.); ED RYAN (F.B.I.); PATRICK MCNARDO (U.S.M.); SCOTT SEWALL (U.S.M.);
    OFFICER SWEET (AA County Police); BEN WILSON
    (B.C.D.C); VENABLE, Social Worker, B.C.D.C.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-952300-AMD)
    Submitted:

    May 14, 1998

    Decided:

    May 21, 1998

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Steven E. Hester, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United
    States Attorney, Perry F. Sekus, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint.* We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Hester v. Stowe, No. CA-95-2300-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Appellant also brought claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown


    Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
    (1971).
    2

    You might also like