Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Graham, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    1) Steven Elliott Graham filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate judge's report and found no reversible error. 3) The Fourth Circuit denies a certificate of appealability and dismisses the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Graham, Nos. CR-95-307; CA-97-468-3 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7175

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Steven Elliott Graham filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate judge's report and found no reversible error. 3) The Fourth Circuit denies a certificate of appealability and dismisses the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Graham, Nos. CR-95-307; CA-97-468-3 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Graham, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Steven Elliott Graham filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate judge's report and found no reversible error. 3) The Fourth Circuit denies a certificate of appealability and dismisses the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Graham, Nos. CR-95-307; CA-97-468-3 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7175

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    STEVEN ELLIOTT GRAHAM,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Rockingham. William L. Osteen, Sr.,
    District Judge. (CR-95-307, CA-97-468-3)

    Submitted:

    January 21, 1999

    Decided:

    February 9, 1999

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Steven Elliott Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Steven Elliott Graham seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion adopting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny

    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Graham, Nos.

    CR-95-307; CA-97-468-3 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like