Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Weber v. US Dept Army, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Calvin Weber appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to the United States Department of the Army and the United States Army Personnel Security Clearance Facility in two cases. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and that oral arguments were not necessary. The court affirmed the district court's decision granting summary judgment to the defendants.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-05-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-1258

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Calvin Weber appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to the United States Department of the Army and the United States Army Personnel Security Clearance Facility in two cases. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and that oral arguments were not necessary. The court affirmed the district court's decision granting summary judgment to the defendants.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Weber v. US Dept Army, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Calvin Weber appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to the United States Department of the Army and the United States Army Personnel Security Clearance Facility in two cases. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and that oral arguments were not necessary. The court affirmed the district court's decision granting summary judgment to the defendants.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-1258

    CALVIN J. WEBER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    No. 99-1259

    CALVIN J. WEBER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES ARMY PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE FACILITY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-982375-AMD, CA-98-3907-AMD)

    Submitted:

    May 13, 1999

    Decided:

    May 18, 1999

    Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Calvin J. Weber, Appellant Pro Se. Tamera Lynn Fine, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Calvin Weber appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment to the Appellees. We have reviewed the record and
    the district courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Weber

    v. United States Dept of the Army, Nos. CA-98-2375-AMD; CA-983907-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 29, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like