Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Hinson V., 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Leo Hinson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his motion to modify his term of imprisonment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied the petition as moot because the district court had now ruled on Hinson's motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-01-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7732

    Original Title

    In Re: Hinson v., 4th Cir. (2006)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Leo Hinson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his motion to modify his term of imprisonment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied the petition as moot because the district court had now ruled on Hinson's motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    In Re: Hinson V., 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Leo Hinson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his motion to modify his term of imprisonment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied the petition as moot because the district court had now ruled on Hinson's motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7732

    In Re:

    LEO HINSON,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus


    (No. CR-02-120)

    Submitted: January 19, 2006

    Decided:

    January 26, 2006

    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Leo Hinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Leo Hinson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the
    district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to modify
    his term of imprisonment.

    He seeks an order from this court

    directing the district court to act.

    Because the district court

    has now ruled on Hinsons motion, we deny the mandamus petition as


    moot.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like