Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ansel Street v. Mrs. Powell, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Ansel P. Street appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical staff. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying relief, as stated in its February 13, 2013 order. The appeals court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts, legal contentions, and materials in the record adequately presented the issues.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6247

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ansel P. Street appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical staff. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying relief, as stated in its February 13, 2013 order. The appeals court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts, legal contentions, and materials in the record adequately presented the issues.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Ansel Street v. Mrs. Powell, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ansel P. Street appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical staff. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying relief, as stated in its February 13, 2013 order. The appeals court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts, legal contentions, and materials in the record adequately presented the issues.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6247

    ANSEL P. STREET,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    MRS. POWELL, Main Medical Staff; DR. LIGHTSEY; NURSE GILES,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    NURSE JONES; NURSE WILLIAMS,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:10-ct-03179-BO)

    Submitted:

    July 25, 2013

    Decided: July 29, 2013

    Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ansel P. Street, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth


    Pharr McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ansel

    P.

    Street

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Street v. Mrs. Powell, No. 5:10-ct-03179-BO (E.D.N.C.

    Feb. 13, 2013).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like