Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Foster, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    1) Nathan Lee Foster appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion and denied Foster's motion to appoint counsel, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-11-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8072

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Nathan Lee Foster appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion and denied Foster's motion to appoint counsel, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Foster, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Nathan Lee Foster appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion and denied Foster's motion to appoint counsel, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8072

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    NATHAN LEE FOSTER, a/k/a Plum,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (5:03-cr-00319-F-1)

    Submitted:

    October 21, 2010

    Decided:

    November 12, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Nathan Lee Foster, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jennifer P. May-Parker,
    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Nathan Lee Foster appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
    of sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Foster, No. 5:03-cr-00319-F-1

    (E.D.N.C. July 17, 2009).

    We deny Fosters motion to appoint

    counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like