Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Traven Lee v. Jeff Frazier, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    23 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Traven Lee's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Lee appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against Jeff Frazier. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its November 29, 2011 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-04-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7647

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Traven Lee's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Lee appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against Jeff Frazier. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its November 29, 2011 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    23 views2 pages

    Traven Lee v. Jeff Frazier, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Traven Lee's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Lee appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against Jeff Frazier. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its November 29, 2011 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7647

    TRAVEN MARQUET LEE,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    JEFF FRAZIER,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (5:11-ct-03101-F)

    Submitted:

    April 4, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    GREGORY,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    April 12, 2012

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Traven Marquet Lee, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Traven Marquet Lee appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    (E.D.N.C.

    Nov.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    29,

    Lee

    2011).

    v.
    We

    Frazier,

    No.

    dispense

    with

    5:11-ct-03101-F
    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like