Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Carver v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Freeman Carver's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion. The appeals court decided the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-09-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6759

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Freeman Carver's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion. The appeals court decided the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Carver v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Freeman Carver's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion. The appeals court decided the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6759

    FREEMAN CARVER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    THEODIS BECK; JIM CAUBLE, Superintendent,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-00-96-2-MU)

    Submitted:

    September 21, 2000

    Decided:

    September 28, 2000

    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Freeman Carver, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Freeman Carver seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court. See Carver v. Beck, No. CA-00-96-2-MU (W.D.N.C.
    May 8, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like