Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Michael Edward Jones's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had concluded that Jones was not entitled to a reduction because his sentencing guidelines range remained the same after considering Amendment 706. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7760

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Michael Edward Jones's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had concluded that Jones was not entitled to a reduction because his sentencing guidelines range remained the same after considering Amendment 706. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Michael Edward Jones's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had concluded that Jones was not entitled to a reduction because his sentencing guidelines range remained the same after considering Amendment 706. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7760

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL EDWARD JONES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00123-chh-1)

    Submitted:

    December 15, 2009

    Decided:

    December 22, 2009

    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Edward Jones, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Edward Jones appeals a district court order
    denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence under 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).
    was

    not

    entitled

    to

    The district court concluded Jones

    reduction

    because

    after

    considering

    Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines, his Guidelines range


    of imprisonment remained the same.
    and find no error.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    Accordingly, we affirm.

    because

    presented

    We have reviewed the record

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like