Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wilson v. Sheriff's Dept, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Charles Wilson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Sheriff's Department and Police Department of Bristol, Virginia. The district court denied relief on Wilson's complaint. Wilson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-08-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1481

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Wilson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Sheriff's Department and Police Department of Bristol, Virginia. The district court denied relief on Wilson's complaint. Wilson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Wilson v. Sheriff's Dept, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Wilson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Sheriff's Department and Police Department of Bristol, Virginia. The district court denied relief on Wilson's complaint. Wilson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1481

    CHARLES WILSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SHERIFFS
    DEPARTMENT,
    Bristol,
    Virginia;
    POLICE DEPARTMENT, Bristol, Virginia,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-04-43-7)

    Submitted:

    August 20, 2004

    Decided:

    August 27, 2004

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Wilson appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Wilson v.

    Sheriffs Dept, No. CA-04-43-7 (W.D. Va. filed Mar. 29, 2004 &
    entered Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like