Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Grooms v. US Attorney, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Robert Grooms' civil complaint as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) which allows for dismissal of frivolous prisoner complaints. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-12-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7524

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Robert Grooms' civil complaint as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) which allows for dismissal of frivolous prisoner complaints. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Grooms v. US Attorney, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Robert Grooms' civil complaint as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) which allows for dismissal of frivolous prisoner complaints. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7524

    ROBERT L. GROOMS, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED
    STATES
    ATTORNEY;
    RON
    ANGELONE,
    Director; TERRY GLENN, Coordinator,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-04-667-1-CMH)

    Submitted:

    November 18, 2004

    Decided:

    December 1, 2004

    Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert L. Grooms, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert L. Grooms, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
    1915A(b) (2000).
    reversible error.
    district court.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Grooms v. U.S. Attorney, No. CA-04-667-1-CMH

    (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like